top of page


Terrain in Teams: The Secret “Sixth Player” (and why it changes everything)
If singles 40k is about your list vs their list , teams 40k adds a whole extra layer: Your list vs their list… on that table… inside that pairing plan. That’s why teams players talk about terrain like it’s a faction. Because in teams, it basically is. And if you’ve been “meaning to try teams one day,” here’s the inconvenient truth: that day is getting harder to book. The Winter ITT is already sold out (and it’s literally billed as the world’s largest 40k team tournament, w
Charles Gould
1 day ago5 min read


The Nottingham numbers post: meta, win rates, and what actually won games
1) Faction representation: what the room looked like Top 10 factions by representation (players with recorded games): Faction Players Share of field Space Marines (Astartes) 32 9.4% Blood Angels 24 7.0% Chaos Daemons 20 5.9% Aeldari 19 5.6% Astra Militarum 17 5.0% Emperor’s Children 16 4.7% Dark Angels 16 4.7% Space Wolves 15 4.4% Orks 15 4.4% Death Guard 15 4.4% This was not a “two-faction meta.” It was wide and that makes conversions and top-table presence far more meaningf
Zachary Becker
Jan 143 min read


Nottingham GT and the UKTC rankings
The NOTTINGHAM 40K SUPER-MAJOR has been and gone, with 355 players in the field, it acted like a rankings gravity well: it pulled attendees up the ladder and pushed some non-attendees down. Below is a data-led breakdown of what changed, why it changed, and what it means if you care about your UKTC position (or want to start climbing fast). The headline numbers Using the rankings snapshot before Nottingham and the updated snapshot after Nottingham: Players previously on the ra
Zachary Becker
Jan 134 min read
bottom of page